Survival’s response to African Parks


Baka man from Republic of Congo. A relative of his was attacked by rangers and later died. © Survival

January 29, 2024

African Parks accusing Survival of not cooperating with them implies a) they didn’t know concerning the abuses, and b) we haven’t given them the details about it. That is improper on each counts. Survival first spoke to African Parks about their park rangers violently abusing Baka Indigenous folks round Odzala-Kokoua Nationwide Park greater than 10 years in the past, and it’s doubtless they’ve identified about it for even longer.

They unquestionably know all concerning the abuses, as a result of we advised them in 2013; we advised them once more in 2014; we revealed a report in 2017; in 2020 a prime US official reported on it – and since everybody who spends even just a few days in a Baka village hears account after account. It isn’t a secret; anybody who travels to any of the Baka villages across the park, as Survival and journalists have, will meet many individuals who’ve suffered terribly by the hands of African Parks’ guards.

Claims that they want extra data from Survival to behave are subsequently each false, and a shameless try and evade accountability.Whereas passing data to African Parks, Survival has protected the identities of some victims who spoke to us in confidence, and are scared about their particulars being shared. That is comprehensible: the husband of a girl who was raped by African Parks guards, for instance, advised Survival researchers that when he complained to the park authorities, he was held captive and crushed for 9 hours.

However African Parks has lengthy had greater than sufficient data – from Survival and others – to behave on one thing that they know all about. African Parks admitted to Survival as way back as 2014 that they knew concerning the abuse, and have even admitted to understanding particulars of particular circumstances we’ve raised. They’ve immense assets, and so they bear accountability as managers of the park and employers of the rangers. Furthermore, they already know sufficient, and have identified it for lengthy sufficient, to clarify that these are usually not remoted incidents, however a rampant, long-standing downside, which arises out of the best way they’ve arrange their park and skilled their guards, and for which they bear accountability.

And nonetheless, they haven’t accomplished what is required to cease it. Some particular person guards have been disciplined or fired, and African Parks – as WWF did earlier than in an identical state of affairs – has employed a legislation agency. In the meantime, they proceed to instruct their military-trained guards to maintain the Baka out of their very own ancestral forest – and so they accomplish that at any value. And, for years, the abuse continues, whereas the Baka camp by the facet of the street, determined to return to their land, to offer for themselves and their households and to guard their forest, and continuously in worry of violent assault.

After greater than ten years, African Parks’ protestations – that they, a multi-million-dollar celebrity-backed conservation group, are usually not accountable for the state of affairs they’ve created or the guards they make use of, that it’s as an alternative the fault of particular person guards, or of Survival, or of anybody exposing the abuse – ring hole.

Doug

Doug

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *